Comments on: Origin of life studies cancel each other https://www.eutimes.net/2010/12/origin-of-life-studies-cancel-each-other/ We deliver exclusive hidden news that you won't just find anywhere, information that nobody wants you to know about. Updated 1 minute ago. Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:32:49 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5 By: anonymous https://www.eutimes.net/2010/12/origin-of-life-studies-cancel-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-21016 Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:32:49 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=11383#comment-21016 It just means that RNA autocatalysis was not first, due to the temperature limitation imposed by a lack of enzymes. However, this just supports the protein autocatalysis theory. This does not rule out all naturalistic ‘origin of life’ theories – just one of the two main ones. So, the other major theory of the origin is just more likely. Why is anyone against evolution. It is well demonstrated everywhere in science. It just means that the system is finely tuned to generate life. One can argue for the system being designed. However, the same evolutionary dynamics described by Systems Theory has been demonstrated in String Theoretic manifolds governing the constants of universes in the multiverse. Nature itself produces life and universes containing life. It is a simple thing to show that complexity like that is not random. Evolution is in the nature of any God. Thinking itself is described by the same mathematics. If one’s God is expected to think in any way (that is, to be personal), it would have to evolve in some way. That is what thinking is. The universe is not a medieval clockwork of perfect bodies. It may be alive itself, or part of some other enormous living being. That doesn’t mean that that “God” is not aware. In fact, if it is a mind, of sorts, then it may have to be aware, perhaps infinitely if an infinite mind. Evolution does not rule out God. It may, in fact, support the concept. Read Kauffman. Furthermore, Einstein proved the non-existance of “time.” This makes any theory of evolution that much more interesting, since time is a major component of evolutionary theory. Nature is likely an itterative process. This greatly supports a higher-order complexity (possibly God). Add in the fact that the mathematics of the current evolutionary theory (Complex Adaptive Systems Optimization) are identical to those that describe functional neural networks. Is “nature” “thinking?” It would appear to be.

Please wait...
]]> By: Cal https://www.eutimes.net/2010/12/origin-of-life-studies-cancel-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-18064 Sat, 01 Jan 2011 04:31:44 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=11383#comment-18064 Any explanation that relies on supernatural factors is by definition not science. And evolution has NEVER had anything to do with the origin of life.

Please wait...
]]> By: Cal https://www.eutimes.net/2010/12/origin-of-life-studies-cancel-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-18062 Sat, 01 Jan 2011 04:30:08 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=11383#comment-18062 In reply to User.

You just figured that out?

Please wait...
]]> By: User https://www.eutimes.net/2010/12/origin-of-life-studies-cancel-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-17867 Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:18:19 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=11383#comment-17867 Once again a fabricated woo-woo fairy tale from the fundamentalist christian creation institute (http://www.icr.org/) through the woo-woo site pravda.ru. It’s obvious by now that EUTimes.net has no credibility whatsoever…

Please wait...
]]>