Home » Eurabia, Europe, Extinction, Immigration, Immorality, Multiculturalism » Swedish integration minister wants zero 'low immigrant areas'


Swedish integration minister wants zero 'low immigrant areas'

 
 
 
 
submit to reddit

Ylva Johansson

Ylva Johansson, Swedish integration minister, has announced a new law that will deliberately move new immigrants into “low immigrant” (majority Swedish) areas, instead of putting them in “high immigrant” areas, endangering the already almost extinct Swedish people.

Back in October 2014, the Swedish Migration Board announced that it would have no problem breaking the law in order to do this; now it seems they will have the consent of the law.

“All municipalities should take in refugees“, Johansson said, “The distribution [of non-European immigrants] is unreasonable. We need to make changes in the law for everyone to take responsibility”

“We need legislative changes to ensure that all local authorities take responsibility for refugee protection”

“Other EU countries must take greater responsibility. But I do not want to achieve it by making it more difficult or worse for people to come to Sweden.”

Sweden has a tiny population of only 9.7 million, out of which at least 2.5 million are of foreign non-Swedish and even non-European descent. As of 2011, according to Wikipedia, 27% of Sweden’s total population was of foreign descent. There are no recent 2014 or 2015 statistics but the since the trend continued with increased speed, mostly because of the Arab Spring and ISIS issues in the Middle East, Sweden should now be at some 35% or more.

If the current refugee trend continues, native Swedes, once known as the mighty Vikings, will go fully extinct by 2100 or maybe even sooner.

Please wait...


RELATED ARTICLES

Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

6 Responses to " Swedish integration minister wants zero 'low immigrant areas' "

  1. The Swedes are suppose to have enough intellect to have seen the problem long before 27% of their population are of non-European descent. Why did they vote for a government whom they knew are on the wrong track ? Or are the majority already so brainwashed that they approved what they thought was the right thing to do ?
    I am afraid Sweden is already beyond repair – that is the price of liberalism !

    Please wait...
  2. sweden yes! this is so tolerant =))

    Please wait...
  3. How many shekels do you want to bet she stays as far away as she can from these immigrant areas? In more enriched nations our brest and britest multiculti lovers hide behind white, gated communities where they rarely venture out to do business and make their $$$ or to tell the lower class whites to go ahead and integrate! Dare I venture to guess she is one of these? If not, it would be an exception to the rule. Do as I say, not as I do, you lower class scum. Am I right? >:)

    Please wait...
  4. And I want zero traitors in government.

    Please wait...
  5. How has any European country benefited by opening it’s borders to non-Europeans? Do they make Europe a safer place to live? Have they made Europe great? Are they good for tourism? Do they bring anything positive to Europe? Do they respect the citizens of Europe and the customs? Do they support themselves without burdening the tax payers? Do they love Europe or what they can get from her?

    Do they victimize the European people in large proportions to their small numbers? Wouldn’t crimes against the European people foreshadow their true intentions? Do they trash up the areas they inhabit in Europe? If they victimize the host country’s people and trash up their land after they have been given a new start at life, wouldn’t that be like a direct “screw you”? Do they demand you to change your ways and customs so they can tolerate you? Do they respect the peoples government? Your family? Your people? Your culture?

    If they are guilty of three of these questions then It would be safe to say they should not be in Europe. There is more harm than good for Europe and her people.

    If a European country don’t let the hoards flood their land they are called “racist” and “Nazis” if they let them in their country will be torn apart. Which one is easier to live with? Which one does the most damage? Which choice is beneficial to the European country and it’s people? Wake up before it’s too late.

    Please wait...
    • Immigrants are needed by Big Bussines, to lower wages. That was modus operandi in Europe for decades – instead of pushing wages up for jobs with poor demand (construction workers, garbage disposal, etc.), they invite immigrants from poor countries who were prepared to work for any wage!

      Please wait...

Conversation Guidelines

Starting a conversation on our website is very easy, all you need to do is to write your name, email and the comment itself. No account is required to leave a comment. Your email won't be used for any purpose whatsoever, if you want, you can even write a fictitious email. Please keep it civil, try to refrain from slurs and insults. We offer Free Speech rights to our comment section but please take note that the comment section is moderated so certain comments may be held for moderation in case they triggered our automatic filters. If your comment is on hold for moderation and you can't see it anywhere there is no need to repost it. Don't worry, it doesn't mean it won't get approved. Please patiently wait and check back later.



Copyright © 2009 The European Union Times – Breaking News, Latest News. All rights reserved.